Weather or Not

Severe Outflow by R. Edwards

  • Home
  • About
  • Archives

Powered by Genesis

Wartime in the Era of Social Media: Watch What You Share!

February 24, 2022 by tornado Leave a Comment

As you’ve likely heard by now, Russian forces have entered Ukraine. One nation’s invading a much smaller, less-powerful neighbor is nothing new historically; it’s happened countless many times. But it is new to the cell-phones/social-media/fake-image era.

Real and bogus images and videos will abound, flooding the internet from true reporters, propaganda bots, and well-meaning but ignorant Uncle Bubbas. Without first-hand knowledge of the situation, you are unlikely to know, with absolute certainty, which is which. You also are likely to overestimate your own ability to judge what is authentic.

This message below is nonpartisan, wise advice right now for all: self-discipline and restraint.

Don’t share emotionally manipulative war images and stories without independent verification — preferably from multiple credible media sources. [Mainline media has been caught sharing fake images hastily before.] Even then, choose prudence over impulse, and wait awhile.

It’s easier for most humans to react with reflexive emotion than self-discipline, restraint, analysis, logic, and reason. We meteorologists have seen this ad nauseam with frequent sharing of old, misdated, manipulated and/or outright fake storm images. Far more is at stake here than some old or fake storm image passed off as yesterday’s event!

War images (real, fake or old) will be shared widely without verifying authenticity — sometimes even by “credible” but duped media. For the sake of all, don’t be the fooled fool.

And for those thirsting for some formally published science on the issue of sharing fake, manipulated and/or misleading imagery, here you go. It really does cause social and psychological damage!

Filed Under: Not weather Tagged With: fakery, media, media ethics, media mistakes, photo fakery, photography, photography ethics, propaganda, self-restraint, social media, war

Deception by Agence France-Presse

January 21, 2010 by tornado Leave a Comment

Please note the following photo, shot for NSSL by Al Moller, near Union City, OK, on 24 May 1973. I have added attribution to the image.

Having been a student at OU and working at NSSL back in the mid-late 1980s, in charge of organizing and cataloguing their slide collection, I became quite familiar with this image and many others. Sometime in the 1990s, after I left, the original slide was digitized and ported to the NOAA online photo library, where it can be found and downloaded by anyone for free use.

Just because it now is in public domain and can be used freely doesn’t mean it should be used deceptively. The news organization Agence France-Presse (AFP) did just that yesterday, with a story on a tornado near Waskom TX. They ran the Union City tornado image in this way (click on the image for a screen capture of the the combined photo and story from Google News).

That’s not the Waskom tornado! Clearly it is a slightly brightness-enhanced version of the 1973 Union City tornado shot. Yet nothing in the caption gives any indication that the photo depicts anything but the an “east Texas” tornado.

At least, in a separate story on a previous day’s tornado in California, supplied to Yahoo, the AFP used the photo with attribution as a file photo in small, light-colored print. That’s still somewhat misleading, in that none of the correct information was provided about the 1973 photo used in the sidebar.

Either the caption needs to be fixed (caption elimination/correction), or better, the photo itself should be deleted (photo kill) from such stories, and in fact, not used in that way to begin with. According to the 2007 edition of its rival’s Associated Press Stylebook (boldface for emphasis):

    “An AP caption ELIMINATION is moved for an acceptable photo that has a caption field that misrepresents the photo or is in bad taste. When this occurs, an AP caption ELIMINATION form is moved alerting members. Then the photo is rerun with the corrected caption using procedures for an AP caption CORRECTION transmission.”

Or…

    “An AP photo ELIMINATION is moved on PhotoStream and DataStream for a photo that carries no threat of legal action but is objectionable for other reasons, such as error, poor taste or inaccuracy.”

I guess AFP has much looser ethical constraints than AP.

That’s not all. Please examine the following screen-captured header from the English-language website of AFP, underlining added by me for emphasis:

“Original images”, my ass! How is a 1973 public-domain photo, that has been used in various public fora for decades, “original” in any way?

Come on, AFP; you can do better than digging up a low-resolution, online-freebie, poor-quality scan of a nearly 37-year old Oklahoma tornado slide, then pasting it into multiple stories about 2010 tornadoes in California and Texas. Sloppy, lazy, dishonest and unethical…definitely unbecoming of the world’s oldest news organization.

The two or three longtime readers of this BLOG may recall that I also busted the Drudge Report for misleading use of the very same photo! One thing is clear: Al’s photo has proved quite popular with lazy journalists.

Filed Under: Weather AND Not Tagged With: AFP, Agence France-Presse, AP, Assciated Press, media distrust, media ethics, news, news ethics, news organizations, news services, news wires, photojournalism, photojournalistic ethics, wire services

Search

Recent Posts

  • Token Participation for a Check Box
  • Public Access to Public Land
  • Independent Review Needed for Weather Disasters and Warning Verification
  • Socialism vs. Communism
  • Critique of Some Weather AI Slop

Categories

  • Not weather
  • Photographic Adventures
  • Scattershooting
  • Weather
  • Weather AND Not

Blogroll

  • CanadianTexan
  • Chuck's Chatter
  • Cliff Mass Weather & Climate
  • Digital Photography Review
  • DMN Dallas Cowboys BLOG
  • Dr. Cook's Blog
  • Dr. JimmyC
  • E-journal of Severe Storms Meteorology
  • Eloquent Science
  • Image of the Week
  • Jack's Cam Wall
  • Jim LaDue View
  • Laura Ingraham
  • MADWEATHER
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Photography Attorney
  • Severe Weather Notes
  • SkyPix by Roger Edwards
  • Tornatrix
  • With All My Mind

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • Token Participation for a Check Box
  • Public Access to Public Land
  • Independent Review Needed for Weather Disasters and Warning Verification
  • Socialism vs. Communism
  • Critique of Some Weather AI Slop

Categories

  • Not weather
  • Photographic Adventures
  • Scattershooting
  • Weather
  • Weather AND Not

Archives

Blogroll

  • CanadianTexan
  • Chuck's Chatter
  • Cliff Mass Weather & Climate
  • Digital Photography Review
  • DMN Dallas Cowboys BLOG
  • Dr. Cook's Blog
  • Dr. JimmyC
  • E-journal of Severe Storms Meteorology
  • Eloquent Science
  • Image of the Week
  • Jack's Cam Wall
  • Jim LaDue View
  • Laura Ingraham
  • MADWEATHER
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Photography Attorney
  • Severe Weather Notes
  • SkyPix by Roger Edwards
  • Tornatrix
  • With All My Mind

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org